Reply to comment

Bit operators = necessary?

I personally don't see anything wrong with moving bit operators into a library. The vast majority of programmers don't need them, and most have likely never used them. We just have too much memory to worry about bitpacking, so unless you're at the protocol level. For that, there may be better solutions in Haskell (I don't know), but there definitely are better solutions in Erlang.

http://erlang.org/documentation/doc-5.4.12/doc/programming_examples/bit_...

There are some great examples in the Programming Erlang book in how this gets used in practice.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may post PHP code. You should include <?php ?> tags.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You can enable syntax highlighting of source code with the following tags: <code>, <blockcode>. The supported tag styles are: <foo>, [foo]. PHP source code can also be enclosed in <?php ... ?> or <% ... %>.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.